Skip to main content
Create interactive lessons using any digital content including wikis with our free sister product
. Get it on the
Pages and Files
Member's Time and Profile
Resources for Deliberations
6 Essential Steps
Knowledge Management Team
How to Use This Wiki
About Your Triggering Question
Round 1-Responses to Triggering Question
Round 3-Amendment of Clusters
Round 5-Root Cause Mapping
How to Respond to the TQ
Why We Use This Webscope Wiki
THE RESULTS OF GROUP WORK
Root Cause Map From Dec 13
Root Cause Map From Jan 31
Anticipating the Challenges to the Vision of a Bottom-Up Democracy
Following the discussion that took place in Round 3, the Amended Table 2 (All of your statements with their explanations) and the Amended Figure 1 (Clusters of like statements) will be attached here.
After studying the statements and their meanings
you are to select
that in your judgment are relatively more important in the context of the triggering question
You do not have to rank them in order of importance, only choose the top 5. You can choose statements across all clusters or from one cluster, whatever you think is relatively more important.
Your assignment is to post your votes by providing just the numbers of your top 5 statements.
The statements from Table 2 are numbered, please use those numbers.
For example, your post could read : "The 5 statements I think are relatively more important in the context of the triggering question are: 3, 12, 20, 35 and 5."
Please post your votes to the discussion tab on this page.
The results of ranking are tabulated as Table 3, and will also be posted on this page.
Voting Results on the Relative Importance of the Inhibitors-final.pdf
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"